Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Outside the Court According to Law Number 14 of 2001 on Patent

Seno Wibowo Gumbira, Adi Sulistiyono, Soehartono Soehartono

Abstract


This article examines the services of arbitration institutions and Alternative Dispute Resolution in resolving disputes concerning deficiencies in the dispute resolution process held in courts. Due to the lack of the litigation process, concerns on legal certainty or sense of justice may not be achieved are raised among the disputing parties, thus dispute resolution held outside the court emerges, in particular within the Patent Law prescribes in Article 124, refers to Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Arbitration denotes a different nature with ADR due to its adjudicative nature which tends to generate win-lose decisions, while ADR has consensus or cooperative nature which prefers to dispose win-win solution decisions. Other forms of ADR are Consultation, Mini-trial, Summary Jury Trial, settlement with organizations, etc. Arbitration and ADR enable a renewal in the settlement of Patent disputes as expected by the public, the deficiency of ADR prescribes in Article 124 of the Patent Law has explicitly stipulated ADR, however the elucidation mentions that ADR comprises negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and other forms in conformity with the laws and regulations.


Keywords


Arbitration, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Patent

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antony Allott, The Effectiveness of Law, Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 15, 1981

Cita Citrawinda Priapantja. Budaya Hukum Indonesia Menghadapi Globalisasi: Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang Di Bidang Farmasi. Jakarta. Chandra Pratama. 1991.

Gatot Soemartono. Aribtrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta. 2006.

IndoPremier. https://www.ipotnews.com/index.php?jdl=Apple_dan_HTC_Selesaikan_

Sengketa_Paten_di_Luar_Pengadilan&level2=newsandopinion&id=1707918&img=level1_topnews_4#.VkOJ9mBUw1g diakses pada tanggal 25 Juni 2020.

John Rawls. A Theory of Justice, terjemahan teori keadilan. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar. 2011.

Lawrence Friedmann. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Cet V. Raja Grafindo Persada. terjemahan Soerjono Soekanto. Jakarta. 2014.

Lawrence Friedmann. On Legal Development. Rutgers Law Review. (dialihbahasakan oleh : Rachmadi Djoko Soemadio). 1969.

Lawrence Friedmann. The Legal System A Social Science Persperctive. Russel Sage Foundations. New York. 1975.

Roger Fisher and William Ury. Getting to Yes; Negotiation an Agreement Without Giving In, Century Business Ltd. London. 1992.

Roscoe Pound. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Bharata. 1989.

Sindonews.com. http://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/824949/35/apple-samsung-sepakat-

mediasi-sengketa-hak-paten-1389243008 diakses pada tanggal 25 Juni 2020.

Supraprto Wijoyo. Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan. Surabaya. Airlangga University Press. 1999.

Surya Perdana. Perkembangan Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) di Indonesia dan Beberapa Negara di Dunia. Medan. Ratu Jaya. 2009.

Suyud Margono, ADR & Arbitrase – Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum. Jakarta. Ghalia Indonesia, 2000

Widnyana, I Made, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (ADR), Jakarta. Fikahati Aneska, 2009.

Yahya Harahap, Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa, Bandung. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v4i2.209

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons
Hang Tuah Law Journal (Print ISSN: 2549-2055 | Online ISSN: 2549-2071) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional. Published by Hang Tuah University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Google scholarcrossrefROAD ISSN Portal Garuda