Problematics of the Legal Settlement of Connective Crimes in Indonesia

Budi Pramono; Agung Pramono

doi:10.30649/htlj.v8i2.253

Authors

Budi Pramono Faculty of Law, Universitas Hang Tuah, Indonesia
Agung Pramono Faculty of Law, Universitas Hang Tuah, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v8i2.253

Keywords:

Problems, Investigation, crime, Connection

Abstract

This research discusses the issue of forming a Joint Decree of the Minister of Defense, Attorney General and Commander of the Indonesian National Army, whether it is in accordance with the provisions of the laws in force in Indonesia. This research falls into the category of normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the research found that the Minister of Defense, the Attorney General and the Commander-in-Chief have the authority to form a Permanent Team for Investigating Criminal Crimes, but its formation does not involve elements of the Indonesian National Police as investigators of general crimes and certain Civil Servant Investigators as investigators of certain crimes (including Commission investigators). Eradication of Corruption) does not comply with the mechanisms regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Military Justice Law. Conditions like this have the implication of not being able to carry out investigations into general crimes and specific crimes related to connection cases, except for corruption crimes. The issuance of the Joint Ministerial Decree has the implication of creating a statutory law in the process of investigating general crimes in connection cases. In order to fill this statutory law, law enforcers carry out legal smuggling by carrying out a separation process, resulting in the potential for inequality before the law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. (2008). Menguak Realitas Hukum Rampai Kolom & Artikel Pilihan Dalam Bidang Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Arif, M. (2016). Penahanan Ditinjau dari Aspek Yurudis dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Lex Privatum, 4(3), 49-56. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/11549

Agus. (2017). In-Depth Analysis: Bakamla Bukti Lemahnya KPK Menjerat Aparat Militer. Indonesia Corruption Watch. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/depth-analysis-bakamla-bukti-lemahnya-kpk-menjerat-aparat-militer

Badu, L. W., Apripari, (2019). Menggagas Tindak Pidana Militer Sebagai Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Militer Dalam Perkara Pidana, Jurnal Legalitas, 12(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v12i1.5788

Gani, R. A., (2012). Koneksitas dan Penyelesaiannya di Mahkamah Militer, Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 12(1), 72-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v12i1.467

Irfan, M., Muchtar, S., Muin, A. M. (2021). Kedudukan Jaksa Dalam Pelaksanaan Penuntutan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Militer Berdasarkan Single Prosecution System, Jurnal Pro Hukum, 11(1), 1-14. https://www.scribd.com/document/666592386/4002

Jurio, F. A., Firdaus, E., Erdiansyah. (2019). Eksistensi Peradilan Koneksitas dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Pasca Lahirnya Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 6(2), 1-15. https://jnse.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/27220

Lapae, K. A. H., Thalib, H., Mappaselleng, N. F. (2022). Kewenangan Jaksa Agung Muda Bidang Pidana Militer Dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Koneksitas. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 3(9), 1506-1521. https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlg/article/view/1084

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Mawarni, Y. (2018) Penetapan Tersangka pada Peradilan Koneksitas dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lentera Hukum, 5(2), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.7579

Medistiara, Y., (2023). Brigjen Yus Tetap Divonis 16 Tahun Bui Terkait Kasus Korupsi Perumahan TNI AD. Detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6988887/brigjen-yus-tetap-divonis-16-tahun-bui-terkait-kasus-korupsi-perumahan-tni-ad

Mau, H. A. & Sinaulan, R. L. (2021) Keabsahan Surat Keputusan Bersama Untuk Penyidikan Perkara Koneksitas Pasca Perubahan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas, 15(1), 15-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/jphl.v15i1.219

Prabandari, P. N.., Sugiartha, I. N. G., Widyantara, I. M. M. (2022). Peranan Jaksa Agung Muda Bagian Pidana Militer dalam Penanganan Perkara Koneksitas, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 4(2), 182-186. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.4.2.2022.182-186

Septiana, S., Hamonangan P, A. (2023). Kedudukan Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Militer dalam Perkara Koneksitas Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 11(1), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.33603/publika.v11i1.8206

Syamsuddin, A. (2017) Kajiantentanganggota Militer yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana dalam Perkara Koneksitas Menurut Kuhap. Lex Crimen, 6(6), 64-71. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/16955

Voges, J., Pongoh, J. K., & Taroreh, H. (2023). Kajian Hukum Kompetensi Yurisdiksi Pengadilan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Koneksitas Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981”, Jurnal Lex Crimen, Vol. XII, No. 2. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/47871

Wahid, D. W., & Rafiqi, I. D. (2022). Manifestation of Eastern Cultural Values by Re-arranging Normon Insulting the President and Vice President. Hang Tuah Law Journal, 6(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v6i1.76

Yuntho, E. (2017) Peradilan Koneksitas Kasus Korupsi. Indonesia Corruption Watch. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/peradilan-koneksitas-kasus-korupsi