Dimensions of Protection Against Deceitful Trade Competition in the Protection of Geographical Indications

Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak

doi:10.30649/htlj.v6i1.69

Authors

Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak Faculty of Law University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v6i1.69

Keywords:

Geographical Indications;, Deceitful Trade Competition;, Legal Protection

Abstract

The dimension of Geographical Indications protection is not only intended to provide protection to consumers, but is actually also a protection for business actors who own registered Geographical Indications. Competition in the increasingly fierce business creates dishonest business actors who claim to have products of the same quality as registered Geographical Indications. The existence of geographical indication rights as communal rights contains a stronger defense dimension than individual rights. Together and institutionally, the geographical indication rights holder community can design strategic steps to fight this unfair competition. Local governments play a key role in protecting and handling registered Geographical Indications in their regions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfons, Maria. (2010). Ringkasan Disertasi Doktor : Implementasi Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Atas Produk-produk Masyarakat Lokal Dalam Perspektif Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Malang : Universitas Brawijaya.

Anggraeni, Nita. (2013). “Perlindungan Terhadap Indikasi Geografis (Produk yang disertai Nama Tempat) dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Internasional”. Mazahib. Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Vol. 12, Issue 2.

Caceres, Ester Olivas. (2016). Manfaat Ekonomi Dari Indikasi Geografis Indonesia, as taken from Lukito, Imam., (2018) Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Mendorong Potensi Indikasi Geografis (Studi Pada Provinsi Kepulauan Riau), Jakarta : Pusat Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.

Djumhana, Muhamad. (2003). Hak Milik Intelektual, Sejarah, Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.

Escudero, S. (2012) as taken from Hananto, Pulung Widhi Hari, et.al. (2019). The Urgency of Geographical Indication as a Legal Protection Instrument Toward Traditional Knowledge in Indonesia. Law Reform. Volume 15, Nomor 1.

Gunawati, Anne. (2015). Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Barang dan Jasa Tidak Sejenis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Bandung : Alumni.

Haq, H.U. (2014). “Creating Appropriate Legal Framework in the Utilization of Intellectual Property Products”, Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol. 9, No. 2 : 70.

Hermansyah. (2008). Pokok-pokok Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

HS, H. Salim dan Nurbani, Erlies Septiana. (2014). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, Jakarta : RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kasenda, S. (2017). “Perjanjian Lisensi Antara Pemilik Hak Terdaftar Dengan Penerima Lisensi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis”. Lex Privatum, 5(9).

Karn, Raj. (2021). Unfair Trade Practices, International Journal of Law Management & Humanities Vol. 4 Iss 3.

Makka, Zulvia. (2021). Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Pelaku Usaha Pesaing terhadap Posisi Dominan dalam Penerapan Rule of Reason, Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol. 02 Tahun 2021.

Martini, D., Haq, H., & Sutrisno, B. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan Obat-Obatan Tradisional Dalam Rezim Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Indonesia (Studi Pada Masyarakat Tradisional Sasak). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(1).

Ngokkuen, C., Grote, U. (2012). “Challenges and opportunities for protecting geographical indications in Thailand”. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 19(2):93-103.

Paterson, J. M. dan Bant, E. (2021). “Should Australia Introduce a Prohibition on Unfair Trading? Responding to Exploitative Business Systems in Person and Online”, Journal of Consumer Policy 44 : 1–19.

Pick, Barbara and Marie-Vivien, Delphine. (2021) Representativeness in Geographical Indications: A Comparison between the State-Driven and Producer-Driven Systems in Vietnam and France. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 5056 accessed June 19 2022.

Radjagukguk, Erman. (2011). Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Raharjo, Satijipto. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahmah, Mas. (2018). The Protection of Geographical Indication for Agricultural Development : Challenges for ASEAN. In: International Conference on ASEAN Studies, 20-23 Maret 2018, PPI Spanyol, Madrid.

Ramli, Tatty Aryani. (2010). “Urgensi Pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis Ubi Cilembu Untuk Meningkatkan Ipm”, Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan Mimbar, Vol. 26, No. 1.

Rangnekar, D. (2004). The Socio-Economics of Geographical Indications, Issue Paper No. 8, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Geneva.

Rokan, Mustafa Kamal. (2012). Hukum Persaingan Usaha Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saputra, Rian., et.al. (2021). Inhibiting Factors Inventorying and Mapping Potential Geographical Indications in Riau Province, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia, proceedings, International Conference on Environmental and

Energy Policy (ICEEP 2021).

Sasongko, W. (2012). “Indikasi Geografis: Rezim HKI Yang Bersifat Sui Generis”. Jurnal Media Hukum, 19(1).

Sharma, D.K. (2014). Intellectual Property and the Need to Protection, Indian J. Sci. Res.

Sheerwood, Robert M. (1997). “The Trips Aggreement: Implication For Developing Countries”, The Jurnal Law And Technology, Vol. 37.

Sherwood, Robert M. (1990). Intellectual Property and Economic Development, Virginia : Alexandria.

Sugiarto, Irwan. (2015). "Perspektif Ilmu Ekonomi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terhadap Diskriminasi Harga," Wawasan Hukum Vol. 33 No. 2.

Syafi’, A., et. Al. (2021) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Dagang Terkenal Atas Tindakan (Passing Off) Pada Praktek Persaingan Usaha. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS) Volume 2, Nomor 8, Agustus 2021.

Tiara, Christin Octa. (2017). Indikasi Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dalam Aspek Tata Niaga Perdagangan Sapi Impor. Masalah - Masalah Hukum, Jilid 46 No. 4.

Tregear, A. (2002). “Work Programme 4 (Link between origin labelled products and consumers and citizens) – Final Report”. Dolphins – Concerted Action, Contract QLK5-2000-0593, European Commission.

Utami, Wahyu dan Adipradana S ,Yogabakti. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Bisnis, Dalam Perspektif Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia, Jakarta : Jala Permata Aksara.

Widiyanti, Marlina., et.al. (2020). Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terkait Persetujuan Perpanjangan Kontrak Pengadaan Give Away oleh PT. Garuda Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor: 23/KPPU-L/2010), Lex Lata, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 2 No. 2.