Legal Efforts of Banks and Buyers on Discharging the Collateral Object for Auction that is Still Occupied

Authors

  • Marina Ayusta Amindya Putri Faculty of Law Surabaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v4i1.8

Keywords:

Breach of contract, legal steps, object collateral

Abstract

Credit is the banking service that would require the colletral agreement of pledge assets to give the creditor a sense of security in case the debtor would not be able to pay the loan based on the agreement. After it is proven that the debtor could not pay the amount agreed on the agreement, then the pledge assets will go for a public auction by the creditor. The provit of the auction then will be used to pay off the amount of money that the debtor owed to the creditor. For instance, the debtor would need to walk away from the pledge assets including their house and other assets in connection to the loan but more often than not, the debtor choose to stay in the buildings they signed as the pledge assets for the amount of money they owe and refuse to walk away from it. Though legally, the buildings that are being written as the pledge assets are essentially forefeitable for the auction to be bought by the buyer for the profit of the creditor. Once they are sold on the auction, they are the property of the buyers instead of the owner who owed the creditor. Thus, this paper questions about the legal steps that can be taken by the creditor and buyers on the emptying of the buildings as the object of collateral based on legal facts, literature, and the law. The paper aims to give a solution on how the object collateral dispute can be solved and the buyers can get what they bough on the public auction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Bahsan, (2007), Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Harahap, Yahya. (2005). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

Hariyani, Iswi. (2010). Restrukturisasi dan Penghapusan Kredit Macet. Jakarta, Elex Media Komputindo.

HS, Salim. (2011). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. CetakanKe 5. Edisi 1. Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.

Poesoko, herowati. (2007). Parate executie Obyek Hak Tanggungan, Laksbang Pressindo, Yogyakarta.

Purnamasari, Irma Devita. (2011). Hukum Jaminan Perbankan. Bandung, Kaifa.

Raharjo, Handri. (2010). Cara Pintar memilih & Mengajukan Kredit. Yogyakarta, Pustaka Yustisia.

Sianturi, Purnama T. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Barang Jaminan Tidak Bergerak Melalui Lelang. Cetakan Ke 2. Edisi Revisi. Bandung, Mandar Maju.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (1999) Hak Tanggungan Asas-asas, Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok dan Masalah yang dihadapi oleh Perbankan.

Bandung: Alumni.

Sutedi, Adrian. (2012). Hukum Hak Tanggungan. Cetakan Ke 2. Edisi 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Try Widiyono. (2009). Agunan Kredit Dalam Financial Engineering, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.

Laws

Law Number 4 of 1996 about Mortgage Rights. Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights and Land Related Items.

Civil Code.

Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBG), Wetboek op de Burgerlijke Rechtvordering (RV) Staatblad 1987 No.52.

Regulation of the Ministry of Finance Number 93 of 2010 concerning Bidding Implementation Guidelines.

Regulation of the Ministry of Finance No. 106 of 2013 concerning Bidding Implementation Guidelines.

Regulation of the Ministry of Finance Number 27 of 2016 concerning Guidelines for Implementing Auctions.

Supreme Court Letter (SEMA) Number 4 of 2014.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-31

How to Cite

Amindya Putri, M. A. (2021). Legal Efforts of Banks and Buyers on Discharging the Collateral Object for Auction that is Still Occupied. Hang Tuah Law Journal, 4(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v4i1.8

Issue

Section

Articles