The Paradigm of Applying Zero Verdict  Based on Principles Legal Certainty, Justice, and Benefit

Rini Fathonah; Daffa Ladro Kusworo

doi:10.30649/htlj.v7i1.138

Authors

Rini Fathonah Faculty of Law, Lampung University, Indonesia
Daffa Ladro Kusworo Faculty of Law, Lampung University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v7i1.138

Keywords:

Legal Principles, Paradigm, Zero Verdict

Abstract

The null verdict is a criminal sentence against someone who has received the criminal sentence with the maximum limit but must be retrialed due to certain cases so that the criminal sentence given is nil or the maximum limit has been reached. Zero verdicts are given to criminals who have received the maximum limit in the principal sentence. Criminal terms for a certain time may not exceed 20 years as stated in Article 12 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Code. Life imprisonment is stated in Article 67 of Criminal Code that if the perpetrator of a crime has been sentenced to life imprisonment, then additional punishment may not be given. The legal gap in the zero verdict is its application, which does not provide any punishment, which in this case has the potential to cause misunderstanding, so that its application needs to be straightened out by reviewing several court decisions, and reviewed from the principles of legal certainty, justice and benefit.. The research method used is normative juridical by studying, viewing, and examining several theoretical matters concerning the Criminal Code and conceptual as the new paradigm. The results of the study show that the Judge's Consideration in imposing Zero verdict, when associated with principles of certainty, practicality, and fairness, has reached all three parameters, even though it is more inclined to principle justice because the imposition of criminal sanctions in all decisions solely refers to criminal acts along with criminal threats by applicable regulations without being contrived.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. (2022). Menolak Tindak Pidana Pasar Modal Dalam Perkara PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya Sebagai Korupsi. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(1), 32-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4887

Ali, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum (L. Wulandari (ed.)). Sinar Grafika.

Anwar, U. (2018). Tindak Pidana Penggandaan Uang Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Tinjauan Kasus Penggandaan Uang Dimas Kanjeng Taat Pribadi). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(4), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v13i4.86

Arief, B. N. (2016). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media.

Artadi, I. (2016). Hukum: Antara Nilai-Nilai Kepastian, Kemanfaatan Dan Keadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 4(1), 67-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/hdm.v4i1.362

Asshidiqi, F., & Irawan, F. (2021). Pengaturan Pembebasan Pajak Dividen Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan dan Asas Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 9(10), 1917-1931. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i10.p16

Baidlowi, A. Z. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Tentang Perbarengan Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Berdasarkan Pasal 340 KUHP. Lex et Societatis, 5(9), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v5i9.18325

Fadlian, A. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Suatu Kerangka Teoritis. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 5(2) 10-19. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/positum/article/view/5556

Fahrurrozi, F., & Paris, A. R. S. (2019). Tinjauan Tentang Sistem Pemidanaan Dalam Perbarengan Tindak Pidana Menurut Kuhp. Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v9i2.889

Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Hazmi, R. M. (2021). Konstruksi Keadilan, Kepastian, dan Kemanfaatan Hukum Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 46P/HUM/2018. Res Judicata, 4(1), 23-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.29406/rj.v4i1.2687

Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman terhadap asas kepastian hukum melalui konstruksi penalaran positivisme hukum. Crepido, 1(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22

Keintjem, F. A. (2021). Konsep Perbarengan Tindak Pidana (Concurcus) Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lex Crimen, 10(5), 190-198. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33437/31640

Kusworo, D. L., & Fathonah, R. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Diversi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Liwa). Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 10(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v10i02.297

Kusworo, D. L., Fauzi, M. N. K., Deviani, E., Nurmayani, N., AT, M. E. P., & Prayoga, S. (2022). Establishment of a National Regulatory Body to Overcome Disharmonization of Natural Resources and Environmental Policies. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(11), 225-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i11.4184

Maulana, M., Yuhermansyah, E., & Dewi, S. (2022). Perbarengan Tindak Pidana Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam (Analisis Putusan Hakim Nomor 39/Pid. B/2019/Pn. Tdn). Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 7(1), 188-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v7i1.12877

Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan. Warta Dharmawangsa, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349

Pinangkaan, R. (2013). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Penerapan Sanksi dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Anak di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 2(1), 5-20. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/996/809

Prayogo, R. T. (2016). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(2), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v13i2.151

Prodjodikoro, W. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Refika aditama.

Radbruch, G. (2006a). Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 13-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi042

Radbruch, G. (2006b). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-statutory Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1-11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600538

Siregar, F. R., & Sitorus, N. T. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Vonis Nihil Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 9(2), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v9i2.7076

Sonata, D. L. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justitia:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283

Sulardi, S., & Wardoyo, Y. P. (2015). Kepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan, Dan Keadilan Terhadap Perkara Pidana Anak. Jurnal Yudisial, 8(3), 251-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v8i3.57

Supriadi, D. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Penerapan Concursus (Ketentuan pasal 65 kuhp) Oleh Hakim dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Akrab Juara, 4(2). https://repository.bsi.ac.id/index.php/repo/viewitem/27515

Supriyono, S. (2017). Terciptanya Rasa Keadilan, Kepastian Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Fenomena, 15(1), 1567-1582. https://unars.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fenomena/article/view/802/575

Suyanto, H. (1982). Hukum Acara Pidana. Zifatama Jawara.

Telaumbanua, F. F., Miharja, M., & Juwita, S. (2022). Kajian Yuridis terhadap Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 dalam Kaitannya dengan Politik Hukum tentang Pidana Mati terhadap Koruptor di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 11354-11361. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i6.10248

Tongat, T. (2022). Dekonstruksi Stelsel Absorpsi Dalam Perbarengan Tindak Pidana Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(2), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.2.2015.216-223

Widnyana, I. M. (2010). Hukum Pidana. Penerbit Fikahati Aneska.

Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asas kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan dalam kaitannya dengan putusan kepailitan pengadilan niaga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 216-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291

Wirawan, A. R., & Komuna, A. P. (2021). Pengampunan Pidana dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan, Kepastian, dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Hukum Humaniora Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 1(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.33830/humaya.v1i1.1863.2021