The Duties and Responsibilities of Curators and Supervisory Judges in the Establishment of Bankruptcy Property
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v5i2.43Keywords:
Bankruptcy;, Curator;, Supervisory JudgeAbstract
Duties and responsibilities of curators and supervisory judges in the enactment of bankruptcy property under Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment. This research aims to find out the Duties and Responsibilities of Curators and Supervisory Judges in the enforcement of bankruptcy property when debtors sell bankruptcy property that harms creditors. This research uses Normative research methods, namely: Library research is research that uses secondary data, namely data sourced from library materials, studying various scientific writings, laws and regulations, documents and other sources related to the material discussed. The result of this research is that curators have a duty to manage and settle bankruptcy property under the supervision of supervisory judges appointed by Commercial Court Judges. Curators also have a personal responsibility if in carrying out their duties he performs kelalalian so as to cause losses to bankruptcy property. While the Supervisory Judge has a duty to supervise the curator in carrying out his duties in cleaning up the bankruptcy property. If the debtor commits a legal action on the bankruptcy hrta that harms the creditor, then the curator based on the mandate of Article 16 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU can file an Actio Pauliana lawsuit to the Commercial Court which aims to cancel the legal actions committed by the previous debtor so that the bankruptcy property can be maximized to be distributed to the creditors.
Downloads
References
Al Mufti, Moch. Zulkarnain. (2016). Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Penjualan Harta Pailit di Bawah Harga Pasar. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 1 (1):92-106 <https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol1.iss1.art6>
Astiti, Sriti Hesti. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Kurator Berdasarkan Prinsip Independensi Menurut Hukum Kepailitan. Yuridika, 31 (3): 440-473 <http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i3.4794>
Hamonangan, Alusianto. (2021). Peranan Kurator Terhadap Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat MAJU UDA Universitas Darma Agung Medan, 2 (1):20-34 <http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/pkmmajuuda.v2i1.1182>
Hartini, Rahayu. (2003). Hukum Kepailitan. Malang: Bayu Media
Hartono, Dedy Tri. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kepailitan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 1 (4):1-9
Holijah, Cholidah Utama. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Hakim Pengawas Dalam Pengurusan Harta Debitur Pasca Pailit. Jurnal Muamalah, 3 (1):41-57
Kadir, Abdul. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti
Kukus, Freisy Maria. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Profesi Kurator Dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Jurnal Lex Privatum, 3 (2):146-153. pp.149-150
Mulyadi, Lilik. (2010). Tugas dan Kewenangan Hakim Pengawas dalam Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran
Saputra, Citra Dewi. (2020). Wewenang dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Hakim Pengawas dalam Proses Hukum Kepailitan di Pengadilan Niaga. Jurnal Thengkyang, 1(1):1-22
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2010). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group
Yulianto. (2017). Restriction On The Rights of Secured Creditors in Bankruptcy Proceedings. Hang Tuah Law Journal, 1 (1):100-110
Regulations
Indonesian Civil Code
Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment
Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2011 Concerning Financial Services Authority
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Hang Tuah Law Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.












