Restitution of Death-Causing Criminal Acts in Justice and Human Rights Perspectives

Putu Lia Puspita; Dominikus Rato; Bayu Dwi Anggono

doi:10.30649/htlj.v8i1.214

Authors

Putu Lia Puspita Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Dominikus Rato Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Bayu Dwi Anggono Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v8i1.214

Keywords:

Criminal Acts, Human Rights, Justice, Restitution

Abstract

Restitution has become a representative of the development of the criminal justice system in Indonesia, with its foundation relying on the eligibility of the rights of crime victims. Such a practice is said to have made the criminal justice system in Indonesia more humane, particularly in terms of human rights. The provision of restitution to victims of criminal acts resulting in death has occurred in Indonesia for the first time. This is based on the presence of severe human rights violations in these criminal acts. This research employs a normative-empirical method, which involves examining the implementation, application, or enforcement of the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia in specific legal events within the community. The balance between fulfilling the rights of both the perpetrators and the victims in criminal acts in Indonesia is increasingly pursued over time, one of which is through restitution. Restitution can be one of the efforts made to fulfill victims' rights, including in cases of murder or violence that causes the victim's death. But, it is challenging to determine an appropriate nominal amount for fulfilling restitution for victims. There is a need for a deeper examination and evaluation of the losses suffered by victims of criminal acts who have lost their lives and their right to life. Thus, the provision of restitution as a means of achieving justice for victims will be better fulfilled.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asplund, Knut D. (ed.). (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pusham UII.

Benuf & Azhar. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504

Gumanti, Retna. (2017). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Bagi Penyelenggara Pemilu dan Sekretariat Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik. Jurnal Al-Himayah, 1(1), 128-144. https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah/article/view/294

Hakim, L., & Kurniawan, N. (2022). Membangun Paradigma Hukum HAM Indonesia Berbasis Kewajiban Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(4), 869–897. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1847

Helmi, Muhammad. (2015). Konsep Keadilan dalam Filsafat Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum Islam. Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 14(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v14i2.342

Hidayati, Ni’matul. (2022). Pertama di Indonesia: Restitusi Korban Pembunuhan Dikabulkan Hakim dan Dibayarkan Pelaku. LPSK. https://lpsk.go.id/berita/detailpersrelease/3528

Huda & Nurhidayatuloh (Ed.). (2011). Politik Hukum HAM di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Ibrahim. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.

Malik & Hanafi. (2023). Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan Bagi Pelaku Dewasa (Studi di Kejaksaan Tinggi Maluku Utara). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 9(2), 278-304. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jkh/article/view/68712

Mansyur, Ridwan. (2022). Perma 1 Tahun 2022 Atur Tata Cara Pengajuan Restitusi dan Kompensasi Korban Tindak Pidana. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/prosedur-berperkara/2068-inilah-ketentuan-restitusi-dan-kompensasi-korban-tindak-pidana

Mantili, Rai. (2019). Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Praktik: Perbandingan Indonesia dan Belanda. Jurnal Ilmuah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 4(2), 298-321. https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v4i2.6460

Marasabessy, Fauzy. (2015). Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45(1), 53-75. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol45/iss1/3

Matompo, Osgar S. (2014). Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Keadaan Darurat. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v21i1.1157

Medina Sari, Annisa. (2023). Restitusi: Pengertian, Tujuan, dan Bentuknya. Faculty of Law Muhammadiyah University of North Sumatra. https://fahum.umsu.ac.id/restitusi-pengertian-tujuan-bentuk-dan-ruang-lingkup/

Nasution, Bahder Johan. (2014). Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern. Yustisia, 3(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106

Nurdhin & Athahira. (2022). HAM, Gender, dan Demokrasi (Sebuah Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktis). Jatinangor: CV Sketsa Media.

Palsari, Cahya. (2021). Kajian Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Tujuan dan Fungsi Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Dasar Fundamental dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(3), 940-950. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v4i3.43191

Prasdyantoro & Zamroni. (2023). Establishment of Special Court for Health Service Disputes: Opportunities and Challenges. Hang Tuah Law Journal, 7(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v7i1.129

Prayogo, R. Tony. (2016). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/PMK/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(02), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v13i2.151

Rahmansyah, et.al. (2023). Studi Hukum Berdasarkan Tipe-Tipe Keadilan Perspektif Aristoteles. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 1(1), 1-25. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/praxis/article/view/158

Rahmawati & Yudianto. (2023). Pengaturan Pemberian Restitusi Dalam Suatu Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor 22-K/PMT-II/AD/II2022). Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(2). 1677-1696. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.273

Saodana et al. (2023). Efektivitas Hukum Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang di Kota Makassar. Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV), 5(2), 424-435. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v5i2.35622

Sihotang, E. G. (2021). Politik Hukum Kaitannya dengan Perkembangan Demokrasi, Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 4(1), 69 - 88. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v4i1.69 - 88

Sulistiani. (2022). Problematika Hak Restitusi Korban Pada Tindak Pidana Yang Diatur KUHP dan di Luar KUHP. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i1.948

Sunarso, S. (2015). Viktimologi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Suyanto & Nugroho. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Pekerja Outsourcing Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan. Jurnal Yuridis Fakultas Hukum UPNVJ, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.35586/.v3i2.179

Triputra, Y. A. (2017). Implementasi Nilai-Nilai HAM Global Ke dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia yang Berlandaskan Pancasila. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art6

Wardhani & Pranawa. (2023). Implementasi Restitusi Terhadap Kekerasan Seksual Kepada Anak Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 11(2), 242-249. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v11i2.71862

Wijaya. (2018). Pemberian Restitusi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 6(2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17728

Yasin, Muhammad. (2019). Perlu Ada Pedoman Valuasi Kerugian Akibat Hilangnya Nyawa dalam Perkara Perdata. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perlu-ada-pedoman-valuasi-kerugian-akibat-hilangnya-nyawa-dalam-perkara-perdata-lt5dceb177a8020/