Penafsiran Delik Makar dalam dinamika Rezim Pemerintahan di Indonesia

Yuni Ristanti; Ahwan Ahwan

doi:10.30649/htlj.v9i1.288

Authors

Yuni Ristanti Faculty of Law, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Ahwan Ahwan Faculty of Law, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v9i1.288

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to analyze the development of interpretation against treason/Makar offense on the Penal Code in the law enforcement in Indonesia. This study is a normative legal research which refers to the foundherentism theory and the interpretation of judges theory against enforcement, the supreme court‘s Verdict No. 574 K / Pid /2012, Verdict number 38 / pid.B /2011/PN.Wmn, verdict No. 07/Pid/2015/PT.AMB. The results of the research finds out that Makar offense has various meanings, Penal Code itself does not on strictly define what Makar offense is. It results in vague norms. Therefore, the interpretation against the article 106 of the penal Code relies on the development of the interpretation of the verdict about Makar offense. So far, various verdict interprets or connect Makar offense -as stipulated in article 106 of Penal Code- with subversion, independence, separatism (martial law i.e. terrorism and armed rebellion). Conducting an independence ceremony which is not an Indonesian independence ceremony, sticking a flag other than the Indonesian flag, an oration which increase the sense of nationality other than a sense of nationality towards the Indonesian state, producing a banner to commemorate the anniversary of independence instead of the Indonesian state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahasa, Pusat. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: (Balai Pustaka, 2008.

Charlie Rudyat. Kamus Hukum. Tim pustaka Mahardika, n.d.

Chazawi, Adami. & Ferdian, Ardi. Hukum Pidana Materiil. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2015.

Chazawi, Adami. Kejahatan Terhadap Keamanan Dan Keselamatan Negara. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2010.

Dwi Ayu Suetha, Anny Wahyudi, and Budi Purnomo. “Menganalisis Perjuangan Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Dalam Merawat Demokrasi Indonesia.” Bihari 4, no. 1 (2021): 31–42. https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/bihari/article/download/2799/1780.

Erdianto. “Makar Dengan Modus Menggunakan Media Sosial,” no. vol. 1 no. 1 Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan (2019). https://doi.org/10.25105/hpph.v1i2.5461.

Fathoni Ahmad. “Sejarah Para Pemberontak Negara.” NU.or.Id, 2020. https://www.nu.or.id/post/read/122413/sejarah-para-pemberontak-negara.

Haack, Susan. Evidence and Inquiry: A Pragmatist Reconstruction of Epistemology. New York: Prometheus Books, 2009.

ICJR, Institute For Criminal Justice Reform. Melihat Potensi Ancaman Kebebasan Berekspresi Dalam Pasal-Pasal Makar Rkuhp. Jakarta: Yayasan Tifa., 2017.

Ignatius Haryanto. Kejahatan Negara Telaah Tentang Penerapan Delik Keamanan Negara. Jakarta: ELSAM, 1999.

Indrawan, Jerry, Kata Kunci, Sistem Politik, and Sumber Daya Alam. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Konflik Di Timor Timur Sebelum Kemerdekaannya Dari Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional 11, No. 2 (2015): 169–190, https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v11i2.1616.%25p.

Jatmiko, Bayu Dwiwiddy. “Periodisasi Pengaturan Kejahatan Keamanan Negara Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legality, n.d. http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/310.

Loebby Loqman. Delik Politik Di Indonesia. Jakarta: IND-HILL-CO, 1993.

Made Darma Weda. Tindak Pidana Makar Dalam Rancangan KUHP. Jakarta: Aliansi Nasional Reformasi KUHP, 2016.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Surabaya: Prenadamedia Grup, 2016.

MD, Moh. Mahfud. Politik Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2017.

Mukhlis, Sulthanah, Zuleha, and Handri Aldino. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Nomor 15 / Pid . B / 2021 / PN . Sgi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Makar Atas Aksi Pemasangan Spanduk Aceh Merdeka” 06, no. 2 (2024): 299–313. https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/majim/article/view/10868/511.

Naimah, Hayatun. “Peralihan Kekuasaan Presiden Dalam Lintasan Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora 12, no. 2 (2015): 119–39. https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v13i1.518.

Nurhuda, Ahmad & Agesti, Yera Zettira. “Masa Pemerintahan Abdurrahman Wahid (1999-2001).” Tarikhuna: Journal of History and History Education 3, no. 1 (2021): 113–14, https://doi.org/10.15548/thje.v3i1.2949.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2023.

Rahman, Riyan, Sahuri Lasmadi, and Usman. “Tindak Pidana Makar Dalam Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Pidana” 3, no. November (2024): 507–544, https://hlr.unja.ac.id/index.php/hlr/article/view/25.

Rio Armanda Agustian. “Tindak Pidana Terhadap Keamanan Negara Dalam Persfektif Delik Politik Di Indonesia.” MMH 40, no. 3 (2011). https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/13073.

Soesilo, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Dan Komentar-Komentarnya. Jakarta: Politeia, 1996.

Tatiek Aryani. “Pemimpin DI/TII Kartosoewirjo, ’Bung Karno Sampai Menangis, Rupanya Hal Ini Penyebabnya.” Grid.Id, 2020. https://www.grid.id/read/042375970/tandatangani-sk-hukuman-mati-pemimpin-ditii-kartosoewirjo-bung-karno-sampai-menangis-rupanya-hal-ini-penyebabnya.

Trahjurendra, Abdurisfa Adzan. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Makar Di Indonesia.” Universitas Brawijaya, 2014, https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/111806/.

Verelladevanka Adryamarthanino. “Gerakan Aceh Merdeka : Latar Belakang, Perkembangan, Dan Penyelesaian.” Kompas.Com, 2021, https://www.kompas.com/stori/read/2021/08/02/130000979/gerakan-aceh-merdeka-latar-belakang-perkembangan-dan-penyelesaian.

Wahid, Deny Noer, & Rafiqi, Ilham Dwi. “Manifestation of Eastern Cultural Values by Re-arranging Norm on Insulting the President and Vice President” Hang Tuah Law Journal 6, no. 1, (2022): 61–76, https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v6i1.76