Tax Penalties and Compliance in Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax: A Constitutional Law Perspective on Local Revenue

Muchammad Catur Rizky; Didit Darmawan

doi:10.30649/htlj.v10i1.330

Authors

Muchammad Catur Rizky Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya
Didit Darmawan Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v10i1.330

Keywords:

PBB-P2 Fines; Taxpayers: Constitutional Law:

Abstract

PBB-P2 is a type of tax that can be adjusted or changed based on rates set by the regional government based on the number of local residents (PAD) domiciled in an area. Land and Building Tax (PBB) is one of the most important components in the Indonesian tax system. This research applies normative juridical, which focuses on the analysis of positive legal norms and relevant data from Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2), as well as its implications for regional tax and revenue needs. The essence of this research is that regional governments are constitutionally authorized to determine PBB-P2 fines as part of their fiscal autonomy based on Law No. 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Regional Levies, However, due to the limited delegative authority of local governments in determining and implementing PBB-P2 taxes, there is the potential for deviation from the principle of legality. In addition, the application of fines does not fully reflect the principle of proportionality because the amount of the fine is not always proportional to the level of violation committed by the taxpayer. This can also be seen in the potential for unequal treatment of taxpayers due to differences in the social and economic conditions of the community. These conditions indicate that the application of PBB-P2 fines still tends to be oriented towards increasing regional revenue, so that the function of taxes as an instrument of justice, equality, and legal certainty in a democratic state based on the rule of law has not been fully realized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adissya, M C, and I Budi. “DESENTRALISASI FISKAL DAN OTONOMI DAERAH DI INDONESIA.” Law Reform Journal 15, no. 1 (2019): 149–63.

Agustin, M W, and A F Mustoffa. “Analisis Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Membayar Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan (Studi Kasus Desa Puhpelem.” Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi 7, no. 3 (2023): 1919–1929.

Arifin, C, M C Rizky, and B Handayani. “Ketentuan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Anak Yang Terbukti Melakukan Penyalagunaan Narkotika.” Jurnal Legisia 17, no. 1 (2025): 117–129.

Arifyanto, M N. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Prinsip Self Asessment System Atas Cara Pelaporan Harta Kekayaan Wajib Pajak Dalam Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 4, no. 1 (2021).

Ferry, P, M C Tengku, and J S Tiara. DUA DEKADE IMPLEMENTASI DESENTRALISASI FISKAL DI INDONESIA. United States Agency for International Development (USAID. Jakarta: Badan Kebijakan Fiskal & Kementerian Keuangan, 2021.

Ibrahim, J. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.

Marzuki, P M. Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Ke-12. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Mukkaromah, A. “Memahami Konsep Pajak Penghasilan Di Indonesia,” 2018. https://news.

Nafiah, W, and P M R Stirk. “Pengaruh Sanksi Pajak, Kesadaran Pajak, Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dalam Membayar Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan (Studi Kasus Pada Kecamatan Candisari Kota Semarang Tahun,” 2018.

Pratama, A R, B E N Sinaga, C R Anggraini, G Muthmainah, and R N Yasmin. “Analisis Efektivitas Penerimaan, Kontribusi Dan Laju Pertumbuhan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan (Pbb-P2) Terhadap Pendapatan Asli Daerah Dki Jakarta.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 11, no. 8. B (2025): 1–17.

Prianti, D G. “Hukum Kenaikan Pajak 12% Atas Barang Mewah Melalui PPnBM.” Perspektif Administrasi Publik Dan Hukum 2, no. 2 (2025): 142–157.

Rafsanjani, I S R, and Z Zulkifli. “Analisis Efektivitas Program Pengurangan Pokok Pajak Dan Penghapusan Denda Secara Otomatis Untuk Tunggakan Pajak PBB-P2 Tahun 1994 Hingga 2022 Terhadap Pengurangan Piutang PBB-P2 Di Kota Yogyakarta: Efektivitas Program Pengurangan Pokok Pajak Dan Penghapu.” Upajiwa Dewantara: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Manajemen Daulat Rakyat 9, no. 1 (2025): 11–19.

Rizky, M C, and D Darmawan. “The Role of Registered Certificate (SKT) as an Instrument of Legal Protection in Indonesian Tax Administration.” International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS 7, no. 3 (2025): 1204–1209.

Rizky, M C, A Herisasono, R Hardyansah, P Saktiawan, and R Saputra. “Constitutional Law Adaptation in Response to Globalization and Urbanization in Contemporary Societies.” Journal of Social Science Studies 2, no. 1 (2022): 195–200.

———. “The Effectiveness of the Legal System in Guaranteeing Equal Rights of Minority Groups in Constitutional Structures.” Journal of Social Science Studies 1, no. 2 (2021): 193–196.

Rizky, M C, and H Udjari. “Reflections on Social Welfare Theory in the Juridical Foundation of Sustainable Public Policy.” Journal of Social Science Studies 1, no. 1 (2021): 185–190.

Rohmah, A Z, and R Sulistyowati. “Evaluasi Prosedur Verifikasi Dan Validasi Objek PBB-P2 Dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Pajak.” Jurnal Media Komunikasi Ilmu Ekonomi 41, no. 1 (2024): 46–59.

Sari, N P P, I M Sudiartana, and N.L.G.M. Dieriyani. “Pengaruh Keadilan Pajak, Sistem Perpajakan, Tarif Pajak Dan Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Persepsi Wajib Pajak Badan Mengenai Etika Penggelapan Pajak,” 2021.

Soekanto, S. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2010.

Suhartono, S, S Sudjai, D Darmawan, M C Rizky, and P Saktiawan. “The Effectiveness of Criminal Sanctions in Preventing Corruption.” A Literature Review of the Indonesian Legal System. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 3, no. 3 (2024): 43–48.